Re: [Xen-devel] Test result of xen-unstable changeset 25249

[Dieter Bloms <dieter@xxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

On Thu, Apr 26, Ian Campbell wrote:

> This is no doubt an issue with 25244:e428eae1838c (CCing author). I
> suspect the problem is that you are not setting any scheduler options
> but it is unconditionally setting them. I think what it really should be
> doing, is reading the current settings, updating those which the user
> has specified and writing them back. I'm not sure how best to achieve
> that in the libxl api though (CCing some scheduler folks)

yes, this is an issue with my patch :(
All default values has to be 0, but only for the credit(2) scheduler
cpu_weight must not.
So I made a patch, which set a default of 256 when the cpu_weight isn't set
and credit(2) is used and let it 0 when the scheduler sedf is used.

Please try the attached patch and see if it solve this issue.


-- 
Best regards

  Dieter Bloms

--
I do not get viruses because I do not use MS software.
If you use Outlook then please do not put my email address in your
address-book so that WHEN you get a virus it won't use my address in the
From field.

Attachment: set_correct_default_credit_weight.diff
Description: Text Data

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel