[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] Fix the mistake of exception execution
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >>> On 15.05.12 at 07:59, "Hao, Xudong" <xudong.hao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx] > >> >>> On 14.05.12 at 12:41, "Hao, Xudong" <xudong.hao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > default: > >> > - if ( trap > TRAP_last_reserved ) > >> > - { > >> > - type = X86_EVENTTYPE_SW_EXCEPTION; > >> > - __vmwrite(VM_ENTRY_INSTRUCTION_LEN, 2); /* int imm8 */ > >> > - } > >> > >> So this undoes Aravindh's earlier change, without replacement. I > >> don't think that's acceptable. > >> > > > > This is the first patch that just correct some instruction in hw exception > > function, as function description above, int n (n > 32) is not delivered by > > this function. > > I'll write another patch of new function for int n handler. > > In that case it would have been nice to indicate that you don't expect > this to be applied just yet (i.e. by marking the patch RFC). > > >> > + __vmwrite(VM_ENTRY_INSTRUCTION_LEN, 1); /* int3, CC > >> > */ > >> > >> Still using a hard-coded 1 here, the more that afaict you can't > >> distinguish CC and CD 03 here. > >> > > > > Just copied it from original code, how about this replacement: > > > > + __vmwrite(VM_ENTRY_INSTRUCTION_LEN, > > __vmread(VM_EXIT_INSTRUCTION_LEN)); > > That's okay as long as on all possible code paths arriving here > VM_EXIT_INSTRUCTION_LEN is actually valid. I'm suspicious this might > not be the case (especially in the case of injection originating from > libxc). Your suspicion is warranted. IIRC this did not work for the libxc case injecting software interrupts. That is why I hard coded the instruction length. Maybe the instruction length can be made caller specific? Thanks, Aravindh _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |