Re: [Xen-devel] Little help with blk ring

[James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> I have done this, and they are in fact identical. Here are the addresses of 
> the
> fields...
> RING at 0x0009a040
> 0x0009a04a status:0
> 0x0009a048 operation 0
> 0x0009a040 id:256
> 
> What else could it be?
> 

Is sizeof() what you expect it to be? That would cause the first request to be 
(mostly) okay, but subsequent requests to be further and further out of 
alignment.

James

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel