[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] xen/mce: Add mcelog support for Xen platform (v2)
> >>>> -static struct miscdevice mce_chrdev_device = { > >>>> +struct miscdevice mce_chrdev_device = { > >>>> MISC_MCELOG_MINOR, > >>>> "mcelog", > >>>> &mce_chrdev_ops, > >>> > >>> You're still reusing those - pls, define your own 'struct miscdevice > >>> mce_chrdev_device' in drivers/xen/ or somewhere convenient and > >>> your own mce_chrdev_ops. The only thing you should be touching in > >>> arch/x86/.../mcheck/ is the export of MISC_MCELOG_MINOR. > >>> > >>> Thanks. > >> > >> I'm *not* reuse native code. > >> I have defined 'struct miscdevice xen_mce_chrdev_device' in > >> drivers/xen, and I also implement xen_mce_chrdev_ops, they are all > >> xen-self-contained. > >> > >> The patch just redirect native mce_chrdev_device to > >> xen_mce_chrdev_device when running under xen environment. > >> It didn't change any native code (except just cancel > >> mce_chrdev_device 'static'), and will not break native logic. > > > > Why are you doing that? > > > > Why don't you do > > > > misc_register(&xen_mce_chrdev_device); > > > > in xen_early_init_mcelog() ? > > > > This way there'll be no arch/x86/ dependencies at all. > > The reason is, if we do so, it would be covered by native > misc_register(&mce_chrdev_device) later when native kernel init (xen init > first and then start native kernel). Won't the second registration (so the original one) of the major fail? So the mce_log would just error out since somebody already registered? _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |