[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xen/mce: Add mcelog support for Xen platform



Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:57:44PM +0000, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
>>> From 1a7951d6ca01d7f2c9dd2bdb6de5f8e7fdcb8bbd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
>>> 2001 
>> From: root <root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Also your git author is busted. I fixed it up for you but
> you might want to run 'git config --user.name' and such

Ah, I forgot it. Thanks for fix it.

> 
>> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 03:12:51 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] xen/mce: Add mcelog support for Xen platform
> 
> What about the cvt_gate_to_trap? Does that need something similar
> to "xen/mce: Register native mce handler as vMCE bounce back point"
> ?

That's vMCE injection logic.
anyway, I will present new round of patch according to Boris and your commends, 
as following
[Patch 1/3] xen-mce-Add-mcelog-support-for-Xen-platform.patch
[Patch 2/3] X86-MCE-AMD-Adjust-initcall-sequence-for-xen.patch
[Patch 3/3] Register-native-mce-handler-as-vMCE-bounce-back-poin.patch

Patch 1/3 and 2/3 are for mcelog
Patch 3/3 are for vMCE injection

> 
> I stuck all these patches on devel/mce.v2 on
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git

Hmm, we discussed base-tree problem before, and decided to use linus latest 
tree.
I pull this morning and rebase my patches based on
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
c/s a01ee165a132fadb57659d26246e340d6ac53265


Thanks,
Jinsong
--- Begin Message ---
  • To: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 15:08:10 +0000
  • Thread-index: AQHNFAcUz2Gw25lhT/Ka9W6Fnpe+PQ==
  • Thread-topic: Xen ras rebase base tree
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 07:13:43AM +0000, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
> Konrad,
> 
> I'm rebasing Xen mcelog and cpu online/offline logic now.
> I'm not quite sure which tree is proper as base tree, has your Xen PM patches 
> all in kernel tree now? if yes, maybe we can directly rebased on latest 
> kernel tree, your opinion?

Use the linus tree. The latest has the xen pm patches.

> 
> and, if we rebased on your pvops
> 1. what's the git address 
> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git ?)
> 2. which branch (linux-next ?)
> (considering your PM patches (which cpu hotplug need reuse some logic) has 
> been in kernel ?)
> 
> Thanks,
> Jinsong

--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.