Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V12 5/9] Revert "pci: don't export an internal function"

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 01:48:14PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-06-13 13:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 01:15:23PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2012-06-12 17:15, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 04:05:19PM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> >>>> This reverts commit 94a09e2c846374a96719cda2b4e1312d8c4b08a7.
> >>>>
> >>>> This function is used by a later patch to parse the BDF of the device to
> >>>> passthrough.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> You probably want to parse the host address?  You don't want to copy the
> >>> bugs in pci_parse_devaddr - write your own that has sane semantics
> >>> for host. E.g. you need to support ARI etc.
> >>
> >> We should really consolidate over one parser for Xen, KVM device
> >> assignment and VFIO. It looks like they all have very similar requirements.
> > 
> > Also rename pci_parse_devaddr to pci_parse_legacy_devaddr
> > to stress it's not something others should reuse.
> 
> That depends on what pci_parse_devaddr will do in the end. If it will
> become as general as my qemu_parse_pci_devaddr, "legacy" would be
> inappropriate.
> 
> Jan

I'd rather keep it separate than adding OPT_LEGACY.

> -- 
> Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
> Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel