[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] extend_brk and fixes to users of extend_brk (v1).
On 07/31/2012 03:42 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: [PATCH 3/3] x86: Let extend_brk return a NULL pointer instead of makes extend_brk not do BUG_ON and instead just return NULL. This allows us to handle the bootup issues more gracefully. NAK. The whole point of the brk allocator is that users specify the upper limit on what they may need and stick to it. Hence it is a fatal code bug if that is ever exceeded. We want to catch those errors, not "handle" them. This means you're either abusing the brk allocator to do something it is not meant to do... which may mean you can a failure in *other* code, or you have a bug in your code that you haven't fixed. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |