Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.3 release planning proposal

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 30.08.12 at 18:11, Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Of course, 18 months is far too long a release cycle for this approach,
> and 9 months may be too long as well.  I think a target cycle
> of 6 months with a "window" of 6 weeks would be a step in
> the right direction

I disagree. Even the fix months of a freeze we're having right
now already is way too long. Nor do I personally consider the
two-weeks-out-of-ten (approximately) model on the Linux side
too nice. Having larger development windows, and shorter
stabilization periods is pretty desirable imo, the more on Xen
where, despite its name, -unstable really normally isn't that
unstable.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel