|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [FOR 4.2] tmem: add matching unlock for an about-to-be-destroyed object
(Guidance appreciated if the Xen patch submittal process
has changed and I need to do more than send this email.)
A 4.2 changeset forces a preempt_disable/enable with
every lock/unlock.
Tmem has dynamically allocated "objects" that contain a
lock. The lock is held when the object is destroyed.
No reason to unlock something that's about to be destroyed!
But with the preempt_enable/disable in the generic locking code,
and the fact that do_softirq ASSERTs that preempt_count
must be zero, a crash occurs soon after any object is
destroyed.
So force lock to be released before destroying objects.
Signed-off-by: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff -r 1967c7c290eb xen/common/tmem.c
--- a/xen/common/tmem.c Wed Feb 09 12:03:09 2011 +0000
+++ b/xen/common/tmem.c Fri Aug 31 13:49:51 2012 -0600
@@ -957,6 +957,7 @@
/* use no_rebalance only if all objects are being destroyed anyway */
if ( !no_rebalance )
rb_erase(&obj->rb_tree_node,&pool->obj_rb_root[oid_hash(&old_oid)]);
+ tmem_spin_unlock(&obj->obj_spinlock);
tmem_free(obj,sizeof(obj_t),pool);
}
Attachment:
xen-tmem-destroy-obj.patch _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |