Re: [Xen-devel] Xen4.2-rc3 test result

["Ren, Yongjie" <yongjie.ren@xxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Campbell [mailto:Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 4:29 PM
> To: Ren, Yongjie
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; 'xen-devel'; Keir (Xen.org); 'Jan Beulich';
> 'Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk'
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen4.2-rc3 test result
> 
> On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 09:18 +0100, Ren, Yongjie wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Konrad Rzeszutek [mailto:ketuzsezr@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> > > Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> > > Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2012 1:24 AM
> > > To: Ren, Yongjie
> > > Cc: 'xen-devel'; 'Keir Fraser'; 'Ian Campbell'; 'Jan Beulich'; 'Konrad
> > > Rzeszutek Wilk'
> > > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen4.2-rc3 test result
> >
> > > > 5. Dom0 cannot be shutdown before PCI detachment from guest and
> > > when pci assignment conflicts
> > > >   http://bugzilla.xen.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1826
> > >
> > > Um, so you are assigning the same VF to two guests. I am surprised
> that
> > > the tools even allowed you to do that. Was 'xm' allowing you to do
> that?
> > >
> > No, 'xl' doesn't allow me to do that. We can't assignment a device to
> different guests.
> > Sorry, the description of this bug is not accurate. I changed its title to
> "Dom0 cannot be shut down before PCI device detachment from a guest".
> > If a guest (with a PCI device assigned) is running, Dom0 will panic when
> shutting down.
> 
> So this is a dom0 kernel issue and not something relating to 4.2? In
> which case I shall remove it from the 4.2 TODO list.
> 
I don't think so.
In my testing, it should be a regression from Xen 4.1 to 4.2.
Xen4.1(22972) + Dom0(kernel3.5.3) = good
Xen4.2(25791) + Dom0(kernel3.5.3) = bad (it has this issue.)

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel