[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Ping: Re: [PATCH] Boot PV guests with more than 128GB (v2) for 3.7
>>> On 06.09.12 at 23:03, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 07:33:24AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 13.08.12 at 09:54, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>> On 03.08.12 at 16:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Didn't get to it yet. Sorry for top posting. If you have a patch ready I >> >> can test it on Monday - travelling now. >> > >> > So here's what I was thinking of (compile tested only). >> >> Obviously, if this works, I'd like to see this included in 4.2 (and >> 4.1-testing). > > No luck. I still get: > > (XEN) Pagetable walk from ffff8800443da070: > (XEN) L4[0x110] = 0000009342f95067 0000000000001a0c > (XEN) L3[0x001] = 0000000000000000 ffffffffffffffff And I can't see why. I wasn't able to track down the original stack trace you saw on the archives - was that identical to this one (i.e. nothing changed at all)? If so (please forgive that I'm asking, I just know that I happen to fall into this trap once in a while myself), did you indeed build and install the patched tools? In that case, adding some logging to the code in question is presumably the only alternative, short of anyone else seeing anything further wrong with that code. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |