Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 16/24] xen: clear IRQ_NOAUTOEN and IRQ_NOREQUEST

[Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 14/09/12 12:13, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Reset the IRQ_NOAUTOEN and IRQ_NOREQUEST flags that are enabled by
> > default on ARM. If IRQ_NOAUTOEN is set, __setup_irq doesn't call
> > irq_startup, that is responsible for calling irq_unmask at startup time.
> > As a result event channels remain masked.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/xen/events.c |    1 +
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c b/drivers/xen/events.c
> > index 5ecb596..8ffb7b7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/xen/events.c
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
> > @@ -836,6 +836,7 @@ int bind_evtchn_to_irq(unsigned int evtchn)
> >             struct irq_info *info = info_for_irq(irq);
> >             WARN_ON(info == NULL || info->type != IRQT_EVTCHN);
> >     }
> > +   irq_clear_status_flags(irq, IRQ_NOREQUEST|IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
> 
> This one just sent a shiver down my spine. Are you doing this for a PPI?

Not really: even though there is just one source of event notifications
(that is a PPI), we have many event channels. When a domain receives a
notification (via the PPI), it checks on a bitmask to which event channel
it corresponds. From the Linux point of view every event channel is a
Linux irq belonging to the xen_dynamic_chip (see
drivers/xen/events.c:xen_dynamic_chip).

So here I am not doing this for the one PPI, but I am doing this for
every Linux irq (of chip xen_dynamic_chip) that represents an event
channel.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel