[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH mini-os enhancements for vtpm 2/8] add posix io to blkfront

To: Matthew Fioravante <matthew.fioravante@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 10:05:00 +0200
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 08:05:40 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
Mail-followup-to: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Fioravante <matthew.fioravante@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Matthew Fioravante, le Fri 05 Oct 2012 14:02:06 -0400, a écrit :
> See latest v2 patch

It looks good, except why BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST-1 and not
BLKIF_MAX_SEGMENTS_PER_REQUEST?

Samuel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH mini-os enhancements for vtpm 2/8] add posix io to blkfront
  - From: Matthew Fioravante

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH mini-os enhancements for vtpm 2/8] add posix io to blkfront
  - From: Matthew Fioravante

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 13931: tolerable FAIL
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Kernel 3.7.0-pre-rc1 kernel BUG at drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c:405 RIP: e030:[<ffffffff814714f9>] [<ffffffff814714f9>] netbk_gop_frag_copy+0x379/0x380
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH mini-os enhancements for vtpm 2/8] add posix io to blkfront
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH mini-os enhancements for vtpm 2/8] add posix io to blkfront
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.