Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH vtpm v2 11/12] add vtpm support to libxl

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 14:47 +0100, Matthew Fioravante wrote:
> On 10/09/2012 09:42 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 14:36 +0100, Matthew Fioravante wrote:
> >> On 10/09/2012 06:32 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >>> IIRC you are reworking the vtpm stuff to only support the stub domaun
> >>> model and not the process model -- does this mean this patch will change
> >>> or is this already only doing stub stuff?
> >> Since I'm not removing the process model, its possible that this. the
> >> tpm mini-os drivers, and the linux vtpm drivers might change slightly.
> >> Would you prefer I held off on these last 2 patches until the changes
> >> are finalized?
> > Might be easiest if you just resent the whole lot when you are ready?
> >
> > I think I've applied everything which might be plausibly independent to
> > this -- if there's remaining stuff you think could go in now and not be
> > affected by this please point me at it.
> >
> > Ian.
> >
> >
> I think we can hold off on patches 8 (tpm drivers) and 11 (libxl vtpm)
> for now. I'll resend them with the next batch. All of the independent
> mini-so enhancements and the xl devid/iomem patches can be commited.
> Those will not change and might be useful for someone doing something else.

I think these are all in now, please let me know if I've missed one.

> The next and final set of patches will include patches 8 and 11 from
> here, removal of the vtpm process model, vtpm-stubdom, vtpmmgrdom, and a
> few new libraries for stubdom that they require. I'll need a little time
> to rework and test them, but they will be coming soon.

Great, thanks.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel