Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 13944: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 13944: regressions 
- FAIL"):
> Mmm, gall-mite is the box on which _all_ the sched=sedf test were
> running for quite a bit of flights, and consistently failing at the
> xen-boot stage. I pointed out the situation already here:
> 
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/devel/258909?do=post_view_threaded
> 
> Now that the very same test has moved to some other host it seems to be
> working again:
> 
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/13943/test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf/info.html
> 
> That could be something very silly to think (in which case sorry), but
> might this all be some hardware issue on that machine?

I guess we should see whether it fails on itch-mite, which is
supposedly identical to gall-mite.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel