Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 06 of 10 v2] libxl: allow for explicitly specifying node-affinity

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 17:02 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: 
> > On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 15:30 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: 
> > > I think you'll probably need to add a line like the following:
> > > 
> > > #define LIBXL_HAVE_NODEAFFINITY 1
> > > 
> > > So that people wanting to build against different versions of the 
> > > library can behave appropriately.  
> > >
> > I see what you mean.
> 
> I think this is a good idea.
> 
Ok then.

> I'm afraid I won't be able to do proper justice to your series until
> the new year.
> 
Yep, I now you're away, and that's fine, my bad I couldn't post it
earlier. :-)

I'll be happy to see your comments when you're back.

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel