[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Need help to debug win7 BSOD on IGD passthrough
>>> >> I did a quick grep in the list, it seems that Jean was trying to >> submit the patch. >> http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-01/msg01129.html >> http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-01/msg01128.html >> >> I guess this is lost accidentally? I don't see obvious negative >> feedback on the thread. >> Adding Jean, and Stefano who reviewed the patch. >> >> Will try this out tomorrow. Hope the patch can work without big modification. >> >> Jean, do you remember if there are other related patches to make gfx >> passthrough working with windows? >> I would like to check if there are more missed. >> > > Ho right I remember those patch, I thought they went in but I guess I was > wrong. Have you tried intel vga passthrough with those patches, does that > make any difference? Haven't got chance yet. Will try it out this weekend to see how it behaves. > Also you should try to remove the OpRegion patch all together and see > if the system is more stable after that. I started my xen journey with version 4.1.3, which does not have the OpRegion patch. But I don't think the windows domU is better with that version. Currently the linux domU works just fine with the OpRegion patch. So I don't believe this is causing issues. But anyway I'll give it a shot if I can't solve it in other ways. > How much RAM do you give to your guest? We were seeing random BSOD > with the Windows driver when the guest had more than 4G of RAM. > To play it safe you should use 3G for your guest. Thanks for this hint. I don't remember the number and need to check it out tonight. Could you clarify if it will cause problem for exact 4GB of RAM? It's not likely that I give it 4GB+, but 4GB is a possible number. > >>>> >>>> But the fix you mention seems to be igfx driver specific. >>>> But I also observe BSOD without it -- I guess the system run with >>>> basic VGA driver in that case. >>>> Is it the expected behavior? >>>> >>>> One more question: does the windows igfx passthrough rely on 1:1 >>>> mapping of MMIO bars? >>>> According to tutorials, nvidia cards require such trick. >>>> But it seems that igfx linux driver does not require this -- the lspci >>>> output shows different memory region on dom0 vs domU. >>> >>> It sounds right that it doesn't need to be but I am not >>> sure; maybe someone else can confirm. >>> >> Jean, do you happen to know if the igfx card rely on 1:1 MMIO bar >> mapping to work on windows? > > The windows igfx driver doesn't require the bar to be 1:1, it requires the > device to be at the same BDF though. So it means that the gfx-passthrough config must be enabled. Thanks for this info. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |