Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] seperate xen checkpoint file as three parts(for xen-4.1.2)

[Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>]

On 06/01/2013 02:27, "éç" <aware.why@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Pasi KÃrkkÃinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 02:52:01PM +0800, ?????? wrote:
>>> 
>>> Â ÂHow to submit a patch to the xen source trunk except through hg mecurial?
>>> Â ÂDoes anybody ever go through such thing by sending the patch to the mail
>>> Â Âlist?
>>> 
>> 
>> http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Submitting_Xen_Patches
>> 
>> -- Pasi
>> 
> ÂHow to submit a patch to the xen source trunk except through hg mecurial?
> ÂDoes anybody ever go through such thing by sending the patch to the
> mailÂlist? 
> 
> My question is thatÂwhy did a patch submitted by the mail list get no
> attentions?Â

It had no motivation as to why anyone should care to split the state file.
It was not submitted in the required form with a signed-off-by line, and
prerferably with the patch in-line rather than as an attachment. And it was
not submitted against development tip of xen-unstable, but against an older
stable branch which is not accepting new features.

 -- Keir

> Whether it has no value of reference or not, Âone of the core members will
> more or less give any response to it.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel