[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen/grant-table: correctly initialize grant table version 1
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 09:16 +0000, Matt Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 12:02:09PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 02:40 +0000, ANNIE LI wrote: > > > > @@ -1080,18 +1081,18 @@ static void gnttab_request_version(void) > > > > panic("we need grant tables version 2, but only version > > > > 1 is available"); > > > > } else { > > > > grant_table_version = 1; > > > > + grefs_per_grant_frame = PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct > > > > grant_entry_v1); > > > > gnttab_interface =&gnttab_v1_ops; > > > > } > > > > - printk(KERN_INFO "Grant tables using version %d layout.\n", > > > > - grant_table_version); > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > Is it better to keep printk here? In your last patch, you removed it > > > because gnttab_request_version and gnttab_resume are all called in > > > gnttab_init. and gnttab_resume also contains calling of > > > gnttab_request_version. But in this patch, gnttab_setup is used, and > > > does not have this issue now. > > > > Yes, I think we want to print this at both start of day and resume? > > > > Either by adding a print to gnttab_resume() or by keeping the existing > > one here in preference to moving it to gnttab_setup(). I'd prefer the > > latter to avoid the duplication, unless I'm mistaken and request_version > > is called in more than those two locations. > > In this version the printk() is in gnttab_setup(), which is called > both at start of day (gnttab_init()) and resume (gnttab_resume()). I > can move it back to gnttab_request_version() if you'd like, but this > patch should be behaving as expected already. I misread the patch, you are absolutely right. Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |