[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] xen: move XEN_SYSCTL_physinfo, XEN_SYSCTL_numainfo and XEN_SYSCTL_topologyinfo to common code
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 17:04 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/time.c b/xen/arch/arm/time.c > > index 9515b42..bcd7769 100644 > > --- a/xen/arch/arm/time.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/time.c > > @@ -41,16 +41,16 @@ uint64_t __read_mostly boot_count; > > > > /* For fine-grained timekeeping, we use the ARM "Generic Timer", a > > * register-mapped time source in the SoC. */ > > -static uint32_t __read_mostly cntfrq; /* Ticks per second */ > > +unsigned long __read_mostly cpu_khz; /* CPU clock frequency in kHz. > > */ > > > > /*static inline*/ s_time_t ticks_to_ns(uint64_t ticks) > > { > > - return muldiv64(ticks, SECONDS(1), cntfrq); > > + return muldiv64(ticks, SECONDS(1), cpu_khz); > > } > > cntfrq and cpu_khz appear to have different units, so is this really > correct? (or else the existing comment on cntfrq is wrong, it implies > that the units are HZ). Yes, you are right, they have different units. I'll fix it. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |