[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] kernel 3.7+ cpufreq regression on AMD system running as dom0
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:22:18PM +0000, Stefan Bader wrote: > So for having the "check for sensible BIOS" in mainline I refreshed > the patch (fixed the bit test, and actually tested it this time) and > also added some hopefully sensible explanation to it (attached > below). > > Should I send it to acpi lists or would that have to go via an Andre? Maybe Rafael could pick it up? > > -Stefan > > From 6e2fc8291c91339123a37162382d8b08b50867ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:17:00 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: Check MSR valid bit before using P-state frequencies > > To fix incorrect P-state frequencies which can happen on > some AMD systems f594065faf4f9067c2283a34619fc0714e79a98d > "ACPI: Add fixups for AMD P-state figures" > introduced a quirk to obtain the correct values by reading > from AMD specific MSRs. > > This did cause a regression when running a kernel using that > quirk under Xen which does (currently) not pass on the contents > of the HW but 0. Actually this should say "does not currently pass through MSR accesses to baremetal" or similar. And this bit you mean is actually bit 63: "63: PstateEn. Read-write. 1=The P-state specified by this MSR is valid. 0=The P-state specified by this MSR is not valid. The purpose of this register is to indicate if the rest of the P-state information in the register is valid after a reset; it controls no hardware." in the MSRC001_00[68:64] P-State [4:0] Registers. > And this seems to cause a failure to initialize > the ondemand governour (hard to say for sure as all P-states > appear to run at the same frequency). > > While this should also be fixed in the hypervisor (to allow > a guest to read that MSR), this patch is intended to work > around the issue in the meantime. In discussion it turned out > that indeed real HW/BIOSes may choose to not set the valid bit > and thus mark the P-state as invalid. So this could be considered > a fix for broken BIOSes that also works around the issue on Xen. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v3.7.. > --- > drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c > b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c > index 836bfe0..41f4bdac 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c > @@ -340,6 +340,9 @@ static void amd_fixup_frequency(struct > acpi_processor_px *px, int i) > if ((boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x10 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model < 10) > || boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x11) { > rdmsr(MSR_AMD_PSTATE_DEF_BASE + index, lo, hi); > + /* Bit 63 indicates whether contents are valid */ > + if (!(hi & 0x80000000)) You can make this a lot more explicit: if (!(hi & BIT(31))) return; This way 1) you're sure you're testing the correct bit and 2) any reviewer can know on the spot which bit it is about. > + return; > fid = lo & 0x3f; > did = (lo >> 6) & 7; > if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x10) Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |