Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 15401: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 14:19 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 15401: regressions 
> - FAIL"):
> > On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 11:44 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > > > including tests which could not be run:
> > > >  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win  7 windows-install     fail REGR. vs. 
> > > > 15179
> > > 
> > > With some handholding, I managed to get the bisector to work on this.
> > > It found that the original "good" version is unreliable: it built Xen
> > > 5af4f2ab06f3 and in two recent tests on the same host, of the same
> > > build, it failed once and passed once.
> > 
> > Hrm, did it make any progress over the w/e.
> 
> It stops when it finds that the failure, or the previous pass, isn't
> reproducible.

5af4f2ab06f3 is before 26461:78e91e9e4d61 thru 26456:1e9a8e155002 which
are Jan's RTC changes which rather rules them out I think.

Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel