Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC] hvm: Allow triple fault to imply crash rather than reboot

[Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>]

On 04/02/2013 15:26, "Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 14:25 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> While the triple fault action on native hardware will result in a system
>> reset, any modern operating system can and will make use of less violent
>> reboot methods.  As a result, the most likely cause of a triple fault is a
>> fatal software bug.
>> 
>> This patch allows the toolstack to indicate that a triple fault should mean a
>> crash rather than a reboot.  The default of reboot still remains the same.
> 
> Just a random thought -- what about adding SHUTDOWN_triple_fault as an
> explicit thing, then the toolstack can decide what to do?

I kind of prefer that, although it will require changes to every toolstack.

An alternative would be to do that, *and* still have the new HVM_PARAM, so
that any SHUTDOWN_* code can be generated by a triple fault (including new
SHUTDOWN_triple_fault) -- but defaulting to SHUTDOWN_reboot so that the
default behaviour is still unchanged.

Or, in any case, I'm not dead against the existing patch, it just seems less
flexible than it could be. But maybe that flexibility is pointless.

 -- Keir

>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> diff -r 5af4f2ab06f3 -r 6f8c532df545 xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
>> @@ -1233,9 +1233,14 @@ void hvm_hlt(unsigned long rflags)
>>  void hvm_triple_fault(void)
>>  {
>>      struct vcpu *v = current;
>> +    struct domain * d = v->domain;
>> +    u8 reason = d->arch.hvm_domain.params[HVM_PARAM_TRIPLE_FAULT_CRASH]
>> +        ? SHUTDOWN_crash : SHUTDOWN_reboot;
>> +
>>      gdprintk(XENLOG_INFO, "Triple fault on VCPU%d - "
>> -             "invoking HVM system reset.\n", v->vcpu_id);
>> -    domain_shutdown(v->domain, SHUTDOWN_reboot);
>> +             "invoking HVM system %s.\n", v->vcpu_id,
>> +             reason == SHUTDOWN_crash ? "crash" : "reboot");
>> +    domain_shutdown(v->domain, reason);
>>  }
>>  
>>  void hvm_inject_trap(struct hvm_trap *trap)
>> diff -r 5af4f2ab06f3 -r 6f8c532df545 xen/include/public/hvm/params.h
>> --- a/xen/include/public/hvm/params.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/public/hvm/params.h
>> @@ -142,6 +142,9 @@
>>  #define HVM_PARAM_ACCESS_RING_PFN   28
>>  #define HVM_PARAM_SHARING_RING_PFN  29
>>  
>> -#define HVM_NR_PARAMS          31
>> +/* Boolean: Should a triple fault imply crash rather than reboot? */
>> +#define HVM_PARAM_TRIPLE_FAULT_CRASH 31
>> +
>> +#define HVM_NR_PARAMS          32
>>  
>>  #endif /* __XEN_PUBLIC_HVM_PARAMS_H__ */
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> 
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel