[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/13] xen: sync public headers
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 16:06 +0000, Paul Durrant wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: 07 February 2013 11:58 > > To: Paul Durrant > > Cc: Wei Liu; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; David Vrabel; Ian Campbell; > > jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/13] xen: sync public headers > > > > On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 09:22 +0000, Paul Durrant wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > [snip] > > > > > > > -#define NR_EVENT_CHANNELS (sizeof(unsigned long) * > > > > > > > sizeof(unsigned long) * 64) > > > > > > > +#define NR_EVENT_CHANNELS_L2 (sizeof(unsigned long) * > > > > > > > +sizeof(unsigned long) * 64) > > > > > > > > > > > > We did a bit of header change to make the ARM code always use > > > > > > 'unsinged long long' on 32-bit (so it is a nice 8-bytes) and > > > > > > 'unsigned long' on 64-bit. This was all done using the xen_pfn_t > > > > > > and > > > > xen_mfn_t typdefs. > > > > > > > > > > > > Any chance you can do that here? That way on ARM - irregardless > > > > > > if it is 32-bit or 64-bit it is always of the 64-bit size? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think so. The reason to use unsigned long here is to > > > > > guarantee each selector (in 2-level case there is only L1 > > > > > selector) fits into a word. > > > > > > > > > > That's still going to be a problem with Windows drivers. Unfortunately > > MSVC uses a 64-bit model where longs are still 32-bit. The only thing that > > is > > word size is a pointer. Any chance we can use uintptr_t rather than an > > unsigned long? (At the moment I have to sed all the public headers to > > replace long with LONG_PTR and it's a PITA). > > > > > > > TBH I don't know much about Windows. But are you suggesting replace all > > the relevant bit in the header or just the specific event channel interface? > > > > I was just pointing out that assumption that unsigned long == native > word size does not hold for 64-bit Windows. So, if we're adding > something new can we avoid use of unsigned long and use an abstract > type defined to be the native word size? Probably ought to be the existing xen_ulong_t. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |