Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.2-testing test] 15450: regressions - FAIL - PUSHED

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 07:31 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 12.02.13 at 20:15, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > We need to decide what to do with xen-4.2-testing.hg non-staging.  I
> > would be tempted to rewind it, if that isn't a horrible thing to do.
> > It's not as bad with hg as it is with git: aiui if you pull from a
> > rewound repo, nothing bad happens.
> > 
> > I think this can be done with hg strip.
> 
> Question is - do we need to do anything here at all? With IanC
> apparently already having found the reason for the regression,
> can't we just get that committed to -unstable, and once pushed
> there put it here (and on 4.1-testing) too?

I'd certainly be inclined to commit the fixes and only if they are not
sufficient think about messing with the trees.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel