Re: [Xen-devel] Patches for v3.9 for the Linux kernel.

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 04:53:24PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 15.02.13 at 17:34, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> 
> >>> wrote:
> > I know that the PVH patches are not in the Xen tree. I am hoping that
> > at least the hypercalls _are_ OK with everybody so we can continue on
> > with this.
> 
> Please don't commit to anything that isn't in the hypervisor tree
> yet. IOW I'd like you to not push the PVH bits that use
> uncommitted hypervisor interfaces (anything preparatory of
> course is okay).

Hm, I believe the only one that was of contention was the 'PHYSDEVOP_map_iomem'
which Mukesh reverted.

The other one is the XENMEM_add_to_physmap_range, which Ian has for ARM.
That is the git commit b6eafa71fa87f4c831e9c2eac736e8ac20b3ea1c
in stable/pvh.v7 tree.

Oh, there is one change in this git commit 
b8724d6bd1c09e34b6c76b57d07ea4d3fbd8ed4c
..and that gets reverted in 68c5bb99d8b8abbf70b3380bed8eca69648193f5 (by Ian).

So from a hypercall perspective - Ian, is the XENMEM_add_to_physmap_range fully
baked ?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel