[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 1/4] dtb: correct handling of #address-cells and #size-cells.
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Ian Campbell wrote: > If a node does not have #*-cells then the parent's value should be > used. Currently we were asssuming zero which is useless. > > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > v7: assert we don't skip any levels in the tree > --- > xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 9 +++++++-- > xen/common/device_tree.c | 12 ++++++++---- > xen/include/xen/device_tree.h | 3 ++- > 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > index 7403f1a..9ce661b 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > @@ -195,11 +195,16 @@ static int write_nodes(struct domain *d, struct > kernel_info *kinfo, > continue; > } > > + /* We cannot handle descending more than one level at a time */ > + ASSERT( depth <= last_depth + 1 ); > + > while ( last_depth-- >= depth ) > fdt_end_node(kinfo->fdt); > > - address_cells[depth] = device_tree_get_u32(fdt, node, > "#address-cells"); > - size_cells[depth] = device_tree_get_u32(fdt, node, "#size-cells"); > + address_cells[depth] = device_tree_get_u32(fdt, node, > "#address-cells", > + depth > 0 ? address_cells[depth-1] : 0); > + size_cells[depth] = device_tree_get_u32(fdt, node, "#size-cells", > + depth > 0 ? size_cells[depth-1] : 0); > > fdt_begin_node(kinfo->fdt, name); > > diff --git a/xen/common/device_tree.c b/xen/common/device_tree.c > index 5301d63..f3d3aa1 100644 > --- a/xen/common/device_tree.c > +++ b/xen/common/device_tree.c > @@ -120,13 +120,14 @@ void device_tree_set_reg(u32 **cell, u32 address_cells, > u32 size_cells, > set_val(cell, size_cells, size); > } > > -u32 device_tree_get_u32(const void *fdt, int node, const char *prop_name) > +u32 device_tree_get_u32(const void *fdt, int node, const char *prop_name, > + u32 dflt) > { > const struct fdt_property *prop; > > prop = fdt_get_property(fdt, node, prop_name, NULL); > if ( !prop || prop->len < sizeof(u32) ) > - return 0; /* default to 0 */ > + return dflt; > > return fdt32_to_cpu(*(uint32_t*)prop->data); > } > @@ -164,8 +165,11 @@ int device_tree_for_each_node(const void *fdt, > continue; > } > > - address_cells[depth] = device_tree_get_u32(fdt, node, > "#address-cells"); > - size_cells[depth] = device_tree_get_u32(fdt, node, "#size-cells"); > + address_cells[depth] = device_tree_get_u32(fdt, node, > "#address-cells", > + depth > 0 ? address_cells[depth-1] : 0); > + size_cells[depth] = device_tree_get_u32(fdt, node, "#size-cells", > + depth > 0 ? size_cells[depth-1] : 0); > + > > ret = func(fdt, node, name, depth, > address_cells[depth-1], size_cells[depth-1], data); > diff --git a/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h b/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h > index 1d04e4f..19bda98 100644 > --- a/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h > +++ b/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h > @@ -66,7 +66,8 @@ void device_tree_get_reg(const u32 **cell, u32 > address_cells, u32 size_cells, > u64 *start, u64 *size); > void device_tree_set_reg(u32 **cell, u32 address_cells, u32 size_cells, > u64 start, u64 size); > -u32 device_tree_get_u32(const void *fdt, int node, const char *prop_name); > +u32 device_tree_get_u32(const void *fdt, int node, const char *prop_name, > + u32 dflt); > bool_t device_tree_node_matches(const void *fdt, int node, const char > *match); > bool_t device_tree_node_compatible(const void *fdt, int node, const char > *match); > int find_compatible_node(const char *compatible, int *node, int *depth, > -- > 1.7.9.1 > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |