Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 16207: regressions - FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 19.02.13 at 10:02, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 05:42 +0000, xen.org wrote:
>> flight 16207 xen-unstable real [real]
>> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/16207/ 
>> 
>> Regressions :-(
>> 
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which could not be run:
>>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64  7 windows-install   fail REGR. vs. 
> 16171
> 
> This looks distressingly similar to the failure in 15401 which we
> overrode with a manual push on the basis that 15179 was a fluke pass.
> Although I suppose one Windows install regression looks much like any
> other...

On closer inspection I'm not as certain about the similarity: Back
then, Windows was not completing a shutdown, i.e. waiting for
some event to happen (looking at/playing with the LAPIC) to make
progress. Here, Windows sits at the logon screen (and both vCPU-s
are idle), yet the VM apparently can't be reached over the network.

But there nevertheless must be some sort of problem (possibly a
regression, but could as well be an intermittent problem now
being exposed more readily), as earlier that other qemut-win
test didn't consistently fail, and the test above didn't fail that
frequently either.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel