[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: rework hypercall argument translation area setup


  • To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:12:17 +0000
  • Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:12:35 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
  • Thread-index: Ac4QNRJ/CrBhmzn9lUuzfWKejcz09w==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: rework hypercall argument translation area setup

On 21/02/2013 13:05, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>>> On 21.02.13 at 13:57, Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 21/02/2013 12:26, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Are we concerned about the performance of guest GDT/LDT page
>>> (un)mappings?
>> 
>> LDT must often change on guest process context switch? So I would think yes
>> we do.
> 
> Linux doesn't normally use an LDT (i.e. only exotic processes
> would have one of non-zero size).

That being the case, we probably don't care so much.

 -- Keir

> Jan
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.