[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] x86/mm changes for v3.9-rc1



On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 09:12:57AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 02/22/2013 08:55 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> >
>> >What is bizzare is that I do recall testing this (and Stefano also did it).
>> >So I am not sure what has altered.
>> >
>>
>> Yes, there was a very specific reason why I wanted you guys to test it...
>
> Exactly. And I re-ran the same test, but with a new kernel. This is what
> git reflog tells me:
>
> 473cd24 HEAD@{75}: checkout: moving from 
> 08f321ed97353cf3b3fafa6b1c1971d6a8970830 to linux-next
> 08f321e HEAD@{76}: checkout: moving from linux-next to yinghai/for-x86-mm
> eb827a7 HEAD@{77}: checkout: moving from 
> 1b66ccf15ff4bd0200567e8d70446a8763f96ee7 to linux-next
> [konrad@build linux]$ git show 08f321e
> commit 08f321ed97353cf3b3fafa6b1c1971d6a8970830
> Author: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Thu Nov 8 00:00:19 2012 -0800
>
>     mm: Kill NO_BOOTMEM version free_all_bootmem_node()
>
> And I recall Stefano later on testing (I was in a conference and did not have
> the opportunity to test it). Not sure what he ran with.

the commit in tip and linus tree have different hash...

commit 600cc5b7f6371706679490d7ee108015ae57ac2f
Author: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri Nov 16 19:39:22 2012 -0800

    mm: Kill NO_BOOTMEM version free_all_bootmem_node()

    Now NO_BOOTMEM version free_all_bootmem_node() does not really
    do free_bootmem at all, and it only call register_page_bootmem_info_node
    for online nodes instead.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.