[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 16231: regressions - FAIL
On 23/02/2013 16:09, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > xen.org writes ("[xen-unstable test] 16231: regressions - FAIL"): >> flight 16231 xen-unstable real [real] >> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/16231/ >> >> Regressions :-( >> >> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, >> including tests which could not be run: >> build-i386 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 16226 > > gcc -Wall -Werror -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer > -fno-strict-aliasing -Wdeclaration-after-statement -o checker checker.c > ./checker > tmp.size > diff -u reference.size tmp.size > --- reference.size 2013-02-22 22:53:31.000000000 +0000 > +++ tmp.size 2013-02-22 23:12:05.000000000 +0000 > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ > trap_info | - - 8 16 > cpu_user_regs | - - 68 200 > vcpu_guest_core_regs | 304 304 - - > -vcpu_guest_context | 336 336 2800 5168 > +vcpu_guest_context | 332 332 2800 5168 > arch_vcpu_info | - - 24 16 > vcpu_time_info | - - 32 32 > vcpu_info | - - 64 64 > make[4]: *** [check-headers] Error 1 > make[4]: Leaving directory > `/home/osstest/build.16231.build-i386/xen-unstable/tools/include/xen-foreign' > make[3]: Leaving directory > `/home/osstest/build.16231.build-i386/xen-unstable/tools/include' > make[3]: *** [xen-foreign] Error 2 > > Are we supposed to still be doing this for i386 ? Yes we are, as we still support our i386 guest ABI. However, the problem in this case appears to be that the ARM structure size has changed. If so, that needs to be fixed, or reference.size needs to be updated. -- Keir > Ian. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |