[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] arch/x86/xen: remove depends on CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 20:47 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Sat, 23 Feb 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 09:03:20AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Dongsheng Song > > > <dongsheng.song@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> The CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL config item has not carried much meaning for a > > > >> while now and is almost always enabled by default. As agreed during the > > > >> Linux kernel summit, remove it from any "depends on" lines in Kconfigs. > > > >> > > > >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >> Cc: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > >> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > >> --- > > > >> arch/x86/xen/Kconfig | 2 +- > > > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > >> > > > >> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig b/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig > > > >> index 93ff4e1..8cada4c 100644 > > > >> --- a/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig > > > >> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig > > > >> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ config XEN_DEBUG_FS > > > >> > > > >> config XEN_X86_PVH > > > >> bool "Support for running as a PVH guest (EXPERIMENTAL)" > > > > > > > > Why not remove this 'EXPERIMENTAL' too ? > > > > > > It was unclear to me if the feature was actually considered unstable. > > > I can resend with the text removed from the title too, if that's the > > > correct action here? > > > > It certainly is unstable right now (which is why it was unstaged from > > the v3.9 train). I hope that by v3.10 it won't be - at which > > point this patch (and the EXPERIMENTAL) makes sense. > > > > So could you respin it please with the text removed as well - and I will > > queue it up in the branch that carries the PVH feature? > > We also have the same flag on Xen ARM, and the reason is that the ABI is > not stable yet. As soon as it is (I think soon now), I'll send a patch > to remove EXPERIMENTAL from there too. In the meantime if the depends EXPERIMENTAL is going away perhaps we should explain the EXPERIMENTAL in the title: 8<---------------------------------------------------- >From bc22bd0f7b20296c449a05d82be950922042bc92 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 09:12:51 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm: xen: explain the EXPERIMENTAL dependency in the Kconfig help Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- arch/arm/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++ 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig index 67874b8..ef14873 100644 --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig @@ -1865,6 +1865,14 @@ config XEN help Say Y if you want to run Linux in a Virtual Machine on Xen on ARM. + + This option is EXPERIMENTAL because the hypervisor + interfaces which it uses are not yet considered stable + therefore backwards and forwards compatibility is not yet + guaranteed. + + If unsure, say N. + endmenu menu "Boot options" -- 1.7.2.5 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |