[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] PATastic fun
On 26.02.2013 18:03, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 04:32:37PM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote: >> On 25.02.2013 10:10, Stefan Bader wrote: >>> On 25.02.2013 04:15, Liu, Jinsong wrote: >>>> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 02:54:16PM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote: >>>>>> Hi Konrad, >>>>> >>>>> Hey Stefan, >>>>>> >>>>>> here is another one from the hm-what? department: >>>>> >>>>> Heh - the really good-bug-hunting one. Lets also include Jinsong as >>>>> he has been tracking a similar one with mcelog. >>>>>> >>>>>> Colin discovered that running the attached program with the fork >>>>>> active (e.g. "./mmap-example -f 0x10000", the address can be that or >>>>>> iomem) this triggers the following weird messages: >>>>>> >>>>>> [ 6824.453724] mmap-example:3481 map pfn expected mapping type >>>>>> write-back for [mem 0x00010000-0x00010fff], got uncached-minus >>>>>> [ 6824.453776] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >>>>>> [ 6824.453796] WARNING: at >>>>>> /build/buildd/linux-3.8.0/arch/x86/mm/pat.c:774 >>>>>> untrack_pfn+0xb8/0xd0() ... [ 6824.453920] Pid: 3481, comm: >>>>>> mmap-example Tainted: GF >>>>>> 3.8.0-6-generic #13-Ubuntu >>>>>> [ 6824.453926] Call Trace: >>>>>> [ 6824.453944] [<ffffffff8105879f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 >>>>>> [ 6824.453954] [<ffffffff810587fa>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 >>>>>> [ 6824.453963] [<ffffffff8104bcc8>] untrack_pfn+0xb8/0xd0 >>>>>> [ 6824.453975] [<ffffffff81156c1c>] unmap_single_vma+0xac/0x100 >>>>>> [ 6824.453985] [<ffffffff81157459>] unmap_vmas+0x49/0x90 >>>>>> [ 6824.453995] [<ffffffff8115f808>] exit_mmap+0x98/0x170 >>>>>> [ 6824.454007] [<ffffffff810559a4>] mmput+0x64/0x100 >>>>>> [ 6824.454017] [<ffffffff810560f5>] dup_mm+0x445/0x660 >>>>>> [ 6824.454027] [<ffffffff81056d9f>] >>>>>> copy_process.part.22+0xa5f/0x1510 [ 6824.454038] >>>>>> [<ffffffff81057931>] do_fork+0x91/0x350 [ 6824.454048] >>>>>> [<ffffffff81057c76>] sys_clone+0x16/0x20 [ 6824.454060] >>>>>> [<ffffffff816ccbf9>] stub_clone+0x69/0x90 [ 6824.454069] >>>>>> [<ffffffff816cc89d>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f [ 6824.454076] >>>>>> ---[ end trace 4918cdd0a4c9fea4 ]--- >>>>>> >>>>>> I found that this is related to your bandaid patch >>>>>> >>>>>> commit 8eaffa67b43e99ae581622c5133e20b0f48bcef1 >>>>>> Author: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> Date: Fri Feb 10 09:16:27 2012 -0500 >>>>>> >>>>>> xen/pat: Disable PAT support for now. >>>>>> >>>>>> I just do not understand how this happens. From the trace it seems >>>>>> the fork >>>>>> fails when duplicating the VMAs (dup_mm calls mmput on failure). So >>>>>> maybe the >>>>>> warning is just related to this. So primarily the question is how on >>>>>> fork the _PAGE_PCD bit can become set? That and _PAGE_PWT are >>>>>> cleared from the supported >>>>>> mask by the patch, so somehow I would think nothing should be able >>>>>> to set it... >>>>>> But apparently not so. >>>>>> Not sure it is a big deal since I never saw this in normal operation >>>>>> and it >>>>>> seems to be ok when unapping before doing the fork. It is just plain >>>>>> odd. >>>>> >>>>> Jinsong mentioned that there is some oddity with the MTRR. Somehow the >>>>> ranges are swapped or not correct. Jinsong, could you shed some light >>>>> on what you have found so far? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, Sander once also reported a similar weird warning when start mcelog >>>> daemon, as attached. >>>> >>>> Basically, it occurs when mcelog user daemon start, >>>> do_fork >>>> --> copy_process >>>> --> dup_mm >>>> --> dup_mmap >>>> --> copy_page_range >>>> --> track_pfn_copy >>>> --> reserve_pfn_range >> >> So that makes it clearer as this will do >> >> reserve_memtype(...) >> --> pat_x_mtrr_type >> --> mtrr_type_lookup >> --> __mtrr_type_lookup >> >> And that can return -1/0xff in case of mtrr not being enabled/initialized. >> Which >> is not the case (given there are no messages for it in dmesg). This is not >> equal >> to MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK and thus becomes _PAGE_CACHE_UC_MINUS. >> >> It looks like the problem starts early in reserve_memtype: >> >> if (!pat_enabled) { >> /* This is identical to page table setting without PAT */ >> if (new_type) { >> if (req_type == _PAGE_CACHE_WC) >> *new_type = _PAGE_CACHE_UC_MINUS; >> else >> *new_type = req_type & _PAGE_CACHE_MASK; >> } >> return 0; >> } >> >> This would be what we want, but only clearing the PWT and PCD flags from the >> supported flags is not changing pat_enabled (which is 1 when PAT support is >> compiled into the kernel). Unfortunately the variable is local and since >> there >> are not any messages about PAT in dmesg I would say pat_init() is not called >> either. Which might be used to disable PAT support by clearing the CPU >> feature >> flag. > > Hm, so: > > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > index 39928d1..9ac70c5 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c > @@ -379,6 +379,7 @@ static void __init xen_init_cpuid_mask(void) > > cpuid_leaf1_edx_mask = > ~((1 << X86_FEATURE_MTRR) | /* disable MTRR */ > + (1 << X86_FEATURE_PAT) | /* disable PAT */ > (1 << X86_FEATURE_ACC)); /* thermal monitoring */ > > if (!xen_initial_domain()) > > > > should do it right? Let me check on the troublesome machine I saw > it. > I could try it as well but somehow my reading of pat_init() is that if that would have been called at all, there should be some message about PAT in dmesg. And normal dom0 boots do not show anything. It looks like pat_init only gets called from two places in mtrr code, and that probably is not done in dom0 either. So clearing the feature is one step, but I would think that also there needs to be a call to pat_init... -Stefan Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |