Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] libxl: move check for existence of qemuu device model

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 16:10 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] libxl: move check for 
> existence of qemuu device model"):
> > On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 11:22 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Oh I see.  TBH once we start to think about these kinds of
> > > installation problems it's difficult to see where we'll stop.
> > 
> > This is one which has been tripping people up in practice.
> 
> OK then.
> 
> Should we stat whichever one we intend to use and fall back to the
> other with a warning, then ?
> 

Could do that if libxl is the one doing the choosing, I suppose. I'd
also be happy with failing explicitly with an appropriate message.

In the case where the user gave an explicit path or version we should
obviously use it or fail. 

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel