Re: [Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.2-testing test] 17115: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 07.03.13 at 11:55, Alex Bligh <alex@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> --On 7 March 2013 10:43:06 +0000 Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On 07.03.13 at 10:45, Alex Bligh <alex@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I think this is because the qemu tag has not been changed.
>>
>> I think this run simple didn't pick up the change. The not updated
>> tag - afaiui - would only affect xen-4.2-testing tests. And I think we
>> really should only do one more update to the tag (in the context
>> here): Either revert back to the previous value, or set to the one
>> resulting from the most change. To know which one first requires a
>> qemu-upstream-4.2-testing test to complete with that most recent
>> change included.
> 
> I think I understand. To be honest I'm finding the automatic testing
> combined with the qemu and xen split, combined with the git changes
> a little confusing ...

But the way it's done it makes certain that the tests of the
separate trees use a sane state of the other tree(s), rather
than exposing regressions that aren't caused by changes to
the tree under test.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel