Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] libxl: xl mem-set should not enforce memory limits

[Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 04:59:34PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 16:57 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 04:32:53PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 16:25 +0000, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > > xl mem-set should not enforce memory limits. If it does
> > >
> > > NB the title says libxl but this is actually an xl change.
> > >
> > > > then after decreasing reservation there is no chance to
> > > > increase reservation directly from guest domain by
> > > > writing to /sys/devices/system/xen_memory/xen_memory0/target*
> > >
> > > This is a feature not a bug I think. It is intentional that if the host
> > > admin sets a memory target the a guest admin cannot exceed that limit.
> >
> > Even thought 'xm' did not do it?
>
> Yes. Please check the archives, this was discussed at the time (at
> length IIRC)

Could you remind thread subject (more or less)?
It was about ballooning or xm/xl itself?

Daniel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel