Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 17716: regressions - FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 18.04.13 at 18:12, xen.org <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> flight 17716 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17716/ 
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64  8 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 
> 17714
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3  8 guest-saverestore   fail REGR. vs. 
> 17713
>  test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3  8 guest-saverestore        fail REGR. vs. 
> 17714
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64  8 guest-saverestore       fail REGR. vs. 
> 17714
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64  8 guest-saverestore        fail REGR. vs. 
> 17714
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64  8 guest-saverestore  fail REGR. vs. 
> 17714
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3  8 guest-saverestore         fail REGR. vs. 
> 17714
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3  8 guest-saverestore   fail REGR. vs. 
> 17714
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 10 guest-saverestore.2 fail REGR. 
> vs. 17714
>  test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3  8 guest-saverestore  fail REGR. vs. 
> 17714

There are floods of (host side!) APIC errors in the logs, and it
the posted interrupt series seems the most likely reason for
this. I'll try to look into this in more detail, but input from you
on possible reasons would be greatly appreciated. Of course I
can't fully exclude that with the little bit of cleanup I did to your
patches I screwed up something...

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel