[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] xen/arm: support for guest SGI



On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 18:42 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Trap writes to GICD_SGIR, parse the requests, inject SGIs into the right
> > guest vcpu.
> > 
> > Add a useful debug printk to vgic_vcpu_inject_irq.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  xen/arch/arm/vgic.c       |   53 
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  xen/include/asm-arm/gic.h |    3 ++
> >  2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
> > index 8495384..26279f9 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
> > @@ -370,6 +370,7 @@ static void vgic_enable_irqs(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t 
> > r, int n)
> >  
> >  static int vgic_distr_mmio_write(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info)
> >  {
> > +    struct domain *d = v->domain;
> >      struct hsr_dabt dabt = info->dabt;
> >      struct cpu_user_regs *regs = guest_cpu_user_regs();
> >      uint32_t *r = select_user_reg(regs, dabt.reg);
> > @@ -498,10 +499,51 @@ static int vgic_distr_mmio_write(struct vcpu *v, 
> > mmio_info_t *info)
> >          goto write_ignore;
> >  
> >      case GICD_SGIR:
> > -        if ( dabt.size != 2 ) goto bad_width;
> > -        printk("vGICD: unhandled write %#"PRIx32" to ICFGR%d\n",
> > -               *r, gicd_reg - GICD_ICFGR);
> > -        return 0;
> > +        {
> > +            cpumask_t vcpu_mask;
> > +            int virtual_irq;
> > +            int filter;
> > +            int vcpuid;
> > +            struct vcpu *vt;
> > +            int i;
> > +
> > +            if ( dabt.size != 2 ) goto bad_width;
> > +
> > +            filter = (*r & GICD_SGI_TARGET_LIST_MASK);
> > +            virtual_irq = (*r & GICD_SGI_INTID_MASK);
> > +
> > +            cpumask_clear(&vcpu_mask);
> > +            switch ( filter )
> > +            {
> > +                case GICD_SGI_TARGET_LIST:
> > +                    cpumask_bits(&vcpu_mask)[0] = (*r & 
> > GICD_SGI_TARGET_MASK) >> GICD_SGI_TARGET_SHIFT;
> 
> Is this the best available way to set a cpumask in Xen?

We could probably use cpumask_or to set the bits in vcpu_mask, but I
don't think it would be a great improvement.


> > +                    break;
> > +                case GICD_SGI_TARGET_OTHERS:
> > +                    for ( i = 0; i < d->max_vcpus; i++ )
> > +                    {
> > +                        if ( i != current->vcpu_id && d->vcpu[i] != NULL )
> > +                            cpumask_set_cpu(i, &vcpu_mask);
> 
> Can this be done with cpumask_any/all and then clearing the current cpu?

cpumask_all doesn't actually exist and I don't see a way to use
cpumask_any to improve this code.
If we were dealing with pcpus, we could use cpu_online_map and
cpumask_clear_cpu, but given that they are vcpus, I don't think we can
do much better than this.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.