Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 10/17] PVH xen: introduce vmx_pvh.c and pvh.c

[Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>]

Hi, 

At 14:25 -0700 on 23 Apr (1366727159), Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h
> @@ -567,6 +567,7 @@ int microcode_update(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(const_void), 
> unsigned long len);
>  int microcode_resume_cpu(int cpu);
>  
>  void pv_cpuid(struct cpu_user_regs *regs);
> +int emulate_forced_invalid_op(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, unsigned long *);

This is much better than the previous changes, thanks.  Can you please
add a comment here describing what the function does, and in particular
how the new argument affects whether page faults are injected?

Tim.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel