Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 0/2] (arm-soc for v3.10) arm: introduce psci_smp_ops

[Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2 May 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:20:32PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 May 2013, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > Hi Stefano,
> > > 
> > > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:12:12PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > ping
> > > 
> > > Is this a ping to have this pulled into Russell's tree?
> > 
> > I thought that we agreed that the patches should go via the arm-soc
> > tree, after Russell acks them.
> 
> Okay, well, is there a reason for them to go through arm-soc?  They
> look more like core code to me than SoC specific - they only minimally
> touch mach-virt.

The original reason is that some SoC specific code depends on this
series (Calxeda I believe).

But you are probably right, if you prefer that I issue a pull request
for your tree, I have no problems with that.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel