Re: [Xen-devel] IO speed limited by size of IO request (for RBD driver)

[Steven Haigh <netwiz@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 30/04/2013 8:07 PM, Felipe Franciosi wrote:
> I noticed you copied your results from "dd", but I didn't see any conclusions 
> drawn from experiment.
>
> Did I understand it wrong or now you have comparable performance on dom0 and 
> domU when using DIRECT?
>
> domU:
> # dd if=/dev/zero of=output.zero bs=1M count=2048 oflag=direct
> 2048+0 records in
> 2048+0 records out
> 2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 25.4705 s, 84.3 MB/s
>
> dom0:
> # dd if=/dev/zero of=output.zero bs=1M count=2048 oflag=direct
> 2048+0 records in
> 2048+0 records out
> 2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 24.8914 s, 86.3 MB/s
>
>
> I think that if the performance differs when NOT using DIRECT, the issue must 
> be related to the way your guest is flushing the cache. This must be generating 
> a workload that doesn't perform well on Xen's PV protocol.
Just wondering if there is any further input on this... While DIRECT 
writes are as good as can be expected, NON-DIRECT writes in certain 
cases (specifically with a mdadm raid in the Dom0) are affected by about 
a 50% loss in throughput...
The hard part is that this is the default mode of writing!

--
Steven Haigh

Email: netwiz@xxxxxxxxx
Web: https://www.crc.id.au
Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897
Fax: (03) 8338 0299

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel