[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] stubdom in 4.3 still based on qemu-traditional?

To: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 13:55:07 +0200
Cc: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Shelton <eshelton@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 09 May 2013 11:55:35 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
Mail-followup-to: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Shelton <eshelton@xxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hello,

George Dunlap, le Wed 08 May 2013 10:59:44 +0100, a écrit :
> The basic problem with qemu-upstream as a stubdom is that it requires
> libc functionality that is not present in minios.

Just curious: which functionality?

Samuel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] stubdom in 4.3 still based on qemu-traditional?
  - From: Eric Shelton
- Re: [Xen-devel] stubdom in 4.3 still based on qemu-traditional?
  - From: George Dunlap

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [Lguest] lguest: unhandled trap 13 and CONFIG_MICROCODE_INTEL_EARLY
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/hvm: avoid p2m lookups for vlapic accesses.
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] stubdom in 4.3 still based on qemu-traditional?
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 17918: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.