Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 10/17] PVH xen: introduce vmx_pvh.c and pvh.c

[Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:47:55 +0100
"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >>> On 23.04.13 at 23:25, Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> 
> > +        case TRAP_no_device:
> > +            hvm_funcs.fpu_dirty_intercept();  /*
> > vmx_fpu_dirty_intercept */
> 
> It ought to be perfectly valid to avoid the indirect call here.

Well, that would entail making the function public and adding to headers,
so I followed the example of other code doing the indirect calls.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel