Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH (V9) 0/2] Add V4V to Xen

[Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 05/31/2013 10:01 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> I think we need to see and agree on both the client and hypervisor side
> before either can be committed, since review on either could cause ABI
> changes.
Yes, of course. Once some more code is ready, but as of now, we still 
need review and comments on
the hypervisor side to make sure the hypervisor part itself is ready 
(soundness,design,security,etc).
I want to note however that the v4v capability provided is modeled like 
a simplified "network" stack,
so that the design is suppose to stand by itself without any client code.

> What is your upgrade plan for libvchan users? Is it to add vsock support
> to vchan?
I'm not aware of such a plan, nor i'm aware of libvchan or what it 
does/doesn't provides in the first place.
If that make sense, then a plan could be devised.

--
Vincent

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel