[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] AMD/IO-APIC: Use old IO-APIC ack method if AMD 813{1, 2} PCI-X tunnel is present
On 04/06/13 10:03, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 03.06.13 at 22:44, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> References at time of patch: >> >> AMD 8132 PCI-X HyperTransport Tunnel >> http://support.amd.com/us/ChipsetMotherboard_TechDocs/30801.pdf >> >> AMD 8131 PCI-X HyperTransport Tunnel >> http://support.amd.com/us/ChipsetMotherboard_TechDocs/26310_AMD-8131_HyperTra >> >> nsport_PCI-X_Tunnel_Revision_Guide_rev_3_18.pdf >> >> The IO-APICs on the above two PCI-X HyperTransport Tunnels will issue illegal >> HT packets if an interrupt gets masked while active. >> >> This is sadly exactly what the "new" IO-APIC ack mode does. The "old" ack >> mode does however avoid this bad behaviour, and stabilises an affected >> system belonging to a customer. > Ugly. > > Can you tell whether any of these systems have more than a single > IO-APIC? Because if they don't, I'd have a much smaller patch > (defaulting to "old" on single-IO-APIC systems) that we have been > carrying for ages, but that wasn't liked by Keir when submitted > originally. The system which caused us the issue has 3 IO-APICs. Two of these tunnels and a southbridge one. > >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c >> @@ -2016,8 +2016,70 @@ static void __init ioapic_pm_state_alloc >> BUG_ON(ioapic_pm_state == NULL); >> } >> >> +/* AMD 8131 and 8132 PCI-X HyperTransport Tunnel IO-APICs will issue illegal >> + * HyperTransport packets if an interrupt is masked while active. This >> leads >> + * to system instability and crashes with no obvious cause. >> + * >> + * This is sadly the exact behaviour of the "new" IO-APIC ack mode, but >> using >> + * "old" mode works around the issue. >> + */ >> +void __init amd813x_errata_quirks(void) >> +{ >> + unsigned i, found = 0; >> + uint32_t bus, dev, vendor_id; >> + >> + if ( boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD ) >> + return; >> + >> + /* Check for the affected IO-APIC version (0x11) to save scanning the >> PCI >> + * bus on most systems. */ >> + for ( i = 0; i < nr_ioapics; ++i ) >> + { >> + if ( mp_ioapics[i].mpc_apicver == 0x11 ) >> + { >> + found = 1; >> + break; >> + } >> + } >> + >> + if ( !found ) >> + return; >> + >> + for ( bus = 0; bus < 256; ++bus ) >> + { >> + for ( dev = 0; dev < 32; ++dev ) >> + { >> + /* IO-APIC is always Function 1. Check for Multifunction. */ >> + if ( !( pci_conf_read8(0, bus, dev, 0, PCI_HEADER_TYPE ) & 0x80 >> ) ) >> + continue; >> + >> + vendor_id = pci_conf_read32(0, bus, dev, 1, PCI_VENDOR_ID); >> + >> + /* 0x7451 is AMD-8131 PCI-X IO-APIC */ >> + if ( vendor_id == 0x74511022 ) >> + { >> + printk(XENLOG_WARNING "Found AMD 8131 PCI-X tunnel. " >> + "Forcing IO-APIC ack method to 'old' due to erratum >> #63\n"); >> + ioapic_ack_new = 0; >> + return; >> + } >> + /* 0x7459 is AMD-8132 PCI-X IO-APIC */ >> + else if ( vendor_id == 0x74591022 ) >> + { >> + printk(XENLOG_WARNING "Found AMD 8132 PCI-X tunnel. " >> + "Forcing IO-APIC ack method to 'old' due to erratum >> #81\n"); >> + ioapic_ack_new = 0; >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + } >> + } >> +} >> + >> void __init setup_IO_APIC(void) >> { >> + amd813x_errata_quirks(); >> + > Just like said on another patch of yours recently - you shouldn't > override command line options. > > Jan > OK - I will tweak it a little. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |