[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.3 development update
>>> On 10.06.13 at 18:04, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * XSA-55 > status: v6 posted > priority: blocker (?) I view this as an unconditional blocker - shipping with a published security vulnerability of this kind would be very bad. Hence, no matter how long it takes, we shouldn't ship without this taken care of. > * AMD: IOMMU accidental clearing > owner: Jan Beulich, Suravee Suthikulpanit > status: v5 posted, but I agree that at most the erratum workaround would be a reasonable candidate to go in before the release. In the most recently posted shape it would even apply without patch 1 (albeit with fuzz, but that means swapping the patch order is no big deal anymore). I meanwhile doubt, however, that having the erratum workaround is that important considering the other flaws. IOW I vote for either taking both (along with the risk), or postpone them together (aiming at a backport to 4.3.1). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |