[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen: fix initialization of wallclock time for PVHVM on migration
On 11/06/13 18:02, Keir Fraser wrote: > On 11/06/2013 17:41, "Roger Pau Monne" <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Call update_domain_wallclock_time on hvm_latch_shinfo_size even if >> the bitness of the guest has already been set, this fixes the problem >> with the wallclock not being set for PVHVM guests on resume from >> migration. >> >> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> >> Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > May as well write directly into d->arch.has_32bit_shinfo and get rid of > new_has_32bit. But apart from that: > > Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> Yikes - we have had a patch in the XenServer patch queue for donkeys years which implements the same fix as this. I had still not manage to decide whether it was a gross hack which we needed to discard or whether it needed upstreaming. I guess this answers the question. ~Andrew > >> --- >> Since this is a bug fix, I think it is suitable for inclusion in the >> 4.3 release, and backported to older releases. >> --- >> xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c | 20 ++++++-------------- >> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c >> index a962ce2..0dcfd81 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c >> @@ -3404,21 +3404,13 @@ static void hvm_latch_shinfo_size(struct domain *d) >> */ >> if ( current->domain == d ) { >> new_has_32bit = (hvm_guest_x86_mode(current) != 8); >> - if (new_has_32bit != d->arch.has_32bit_shinfo) { >> + if (new_has_32bit != d->arch.has_32bit_shinfo) >> d->arch.has_32bit_shinfo = new_has_32bit; >> - /* >> - * Make sure that the timebase in the shared info >> - * structure is correct for its new bit-ness. We should >> - * arguably try to convert the other fields as well, but >> - * that's much more problematic (e.g. what do you do if >> - * you're going from 64 bit to 32 bit and there's an event >> - * channel pending which doesn't exist in the 32 bit >> - * version?). Just setting the wallclock time seems to be >> - * sufficient for everything we do, even if it is a bit of >> - * a hack. >> - */ >> - update_domain_wallclock_time(d); >> - } >> + /* >> + * Make sure that the timebase in the shared info >> + * structure is correct. >> + */ >> + update_domain_wallclock_time(d); >> } >> } >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |