Re: [Xen-devel] [Hackathon Minutes] Xen 4.4 Planning

[Gordan Bobic <gordan@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 11:45:52 +0100, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
> > > > On 14.06.13 at 11:59, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth.xen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I also wanted to add to the point that Alex has made on serious bugs 
> > in xen
> > vs. kvm : this gets raised regularly by Xen users when I attend
> > conferences. And I also heard a few times now that we appear to 
> > focus more
> > on sexy features rather than the basics. This is relatively new 
> > though: the
> > first time I noticed was towards the end of last year. Which does 
> > not mean
> > that this is new: it may just mean that top issues/concerns that 
> > were
> > frequently raised before (mainly trust in the future of the project) 
> > have
> > disappeared.
> I'd really like to see examples of this - there ought to be quite a
> few according to what you write, yet I don't seem to recall any
> that got plainly ignored. Of course there are always bugs which
> take longer than others to figure out and fix.
Not a bug per se, but arguably a relatively important feature; does
the lack of feature to pass multiple USB devices to domU
count as an example of this?

Gordan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel