[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] hrtimers: provide a hrtimers_late_resume() call

On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 21/06/13 15:32, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> However, since hrtimers require the use of a one-shot ticker and when
> one-shot timers are resumed they are armed to fire immediately (see
> tick_resume_oneshot()) this interrupt is sufficient to kick the require
> softirq.
> So, as proposed before:
> hrtimers_resume()
> {
>    /* This CPU's tick is armed to fire immediately by
>       tick_oneshot_resume(). Just need raise a softirq to program
>       the timers on all CPUs. */
>    cpu_base->clock_was_set = 1;
>    __raise_softirq_irqoff(HRTIMER_SOFTIRQ);
> }
> Do you agree or disagree?

Fair enough. I did not think about that. With the comment in place it
is clear. It might be a bit more elaborate for the casual reader.



Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.