Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/3] VMX: fix interaction of Viridian emulation with advanced features

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 21.06.13 at 18:25, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It's a bit hard to tell which one of 1 or 2 is the lowest risk from a 
> release perspective -- my instinct is to go with #1 (assuming I've 
> understood it correctly), as it relies on expected behavior of the 
> hardware, not on expected behavior of Windows.  But I think whichever 
> you think is best is fine with me, as long as you get an Ack from Paul 
> for #2.

If you prefer #1, I'm fine with that. I proposed #2 to be it just
because it's less of a change. For us to go with #1, let me split
off the cleanup aspects of it into a separate patch; we'd want
an ack from a VMX maintainer for it perhaps just as much as that
from Paul for #2.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel